f7150e2
|
Wrong does not cease to be wrong because the majority share in it.
|
|
wrong
truth
majority
right-and-wrong
|
Leo Tolstoy |
3679ddb
|
"I want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus, and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you're being had.
|
|
evolution
bisphenol-a
bpa
dr-jack-cohen-podiatrist
excitotoxins
fluoride
man-made-global-warming
manmade-global-warming
minority-view
monosodium-glutamate
msg
scientific-discovery
scientific-inquiry
scientific-process
science
scientific-research
scientific-revolution
majority
scientific-theory
minority
consensus
scientific-method
global-warming
majority-view
september-11-attacks
id
macro-evolution
macroevolution
intelligent-design
darwinism
|
Michael Crichton |
85f017b
|
Of course, the aim of a constitutional democracy is to safeguard the rights of the minority and avoid the tyranny of the majority. (p. 102)
|
|
majority
minority
|
Cornel West |
7539901
|
The existence of a majority logically implies a corresponding minority.
|
|
majority
minority
|
Philip K. Dick |
71ee545
|
If an action must be taken that will benefit the majority at the cost of the minority, is it morally indefensible? If an action taken for the benefit of a majority occurs at the expense of a minority, is it moral action?
|
|
benefit
shades-children
garth-nix
majority
minority
shade
morals
|
Garth Nix |
9dec874
|
A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority.
|
|
politics
majority
restance
minority
power
democracy
|
Henry David Thoreau |
142dd53
|
In a democracy, we should be reluctant to take any action that amounts to an attempt to coerce the majority, for such attempts imply the rejection of majority rule, to which there is no acceptable alternative. There may, of course, be cases where the majority decision is so appalling that coercion is justified, whatever the risk. The obligation to obey a genuine majority decision is not absolute. We show our respect for the principle, not by blind obedience to the majority, but by regarding ourselves as justified in disobeying only in extreme circumstances.
|
|
majority
law
ethics
|
Peter Singer |