Gala	RWebster	3:21	Is the law then against the promises of God? By no means: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
Gala	EMTV	3:21	Therefore, is the law against the promises of God? By no means! For if a law had been given which was able to give life, truly righteousness would have been by the law.
Gala	NHEBJE	3:21	Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could make alive, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.
Gala	Etheridg	3:21	Is the law therefore against the promise of Aloha? Impossible: for if a law had been given which could make to live, certainly righteousness would have been by the law.
Gala	ABP	3:21	Then is the law against the promises of God? May it not be. For if [2was given 1a law] being able to restore life, then really [4then 5of 6law 3was 1the 2righteousness].
Gala	NHEBME	3:21	Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could make alive, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.
Gala	Rotherha	3:21	Is, the law, then, against the promises [of God]? Far be it! For, if a law had been given, which had been able to give life, verily, in law, would have been our righteousness;
Gala	LEB	3:21	Therefore is the law opposed to the promises of God? May it never be! For if a law had been given that was able to give life, certainly righteousness would have been from the law.
Gala	BWE	3:21	Is the law against the promises of God? No, it is not! If a law had been given that could give people life, then surely people would have become good people by the law.
Gala	Twenty	3:21	Does that set the Law in opposition to God's promises? Heaven forbid! For, if a Law had been given capable of bestowing Life, then righteousness would have actually owed its existence to Law.
Gala	ISV	3:21	So is the law in conflict with the promises of God? Of course not! For if a law had been given that could give us life, then certainly righteousness would come through the law.
Gala	RNKJV	3:21	Is the law then against the promises of יהוה? By no means: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
Gala	Jubilee2	3:21	[Is] the law then against the promises of God? No, in no wise, for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
Gala	Webster	3:21	[Is] the law then against the promises of God? By no means: for if there had been a law given which could give life, verily righteousness would have been by the law.
Gala	Darby	3:21	[Is] then the law against the promises ofGod? Far be the thought. For if a law had been given able to quicken, then indeed righteousness were on the principle of law;
Gala	OEB	3:21	Does that set the law in opposition to God’s promises? Heaven forbid! For, if a law had been given capable of bestowing life, then righteousness would have actually owed its existence to law.
Gala	ASV	3:21	Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could make alive, verily righteousness would have been of the law.
Gala	Anderson	3:21	Is the law, then, against the promises of God? It can not be. For if a law had been given which could have given life, surely righteousness would have been by law.
Gala	Godbey	3:21	Then was the law against the promises of God? it could not be so. For if the law was given being able to create life, truly justification would have been by law:
Gala	LITV	3:21	Then is the Law against the promises of God? Let it not be! For if a law had been given which had been able to make alive, indeed righteousness would have been out of law.
Gala	Geneva15	3:21	Is the Lawe then against the promises of God? God forbid: For if there had bene a Lawe giuen which coulde haue giuen life, surely righteousnes should haue bene by the Lawe.
Gala	Montgome	3:21	Is the Law then opposed to the promises of God? Certainly not; for if a law had been given which could make alive, then righteousness would actually have come from law;
Gala	CPDV	3:21	So then, was the law contrary to the promises of God? Let it not be so! For if a law had been given, which was able to give life, truly justice would be of the law.
Gala	Weymouth	3:21	God, however, is only one. Is the Law then opposed to the promises of God? No, indeed; for if a Law had been given which could have conferred Life, righteousness would certainly have come by the Law.
Gala	LO	3:21	Is the law, then, contrary to the promise of God? By no means. For if there had been a law given, which was able to make alive, certainly righteousness would have been by law.
Gala	Common	3:21	Is the law then opposed to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given which could impart life, then righteousness would indeed have come by the law.
Gala	BBE	3:21	Is the law then against the words of God? in no way; because if there had been a law which was able to give life, truly righteousness would have been by the law.
Gala	Worsley	3:21	Is the law then contrary to the promises of God? not at all: for if a law had been given, which could have confered life, certainly righteousness would have been by the law.
Gala	DRC	3:21	Was the law then against the promises of God: God forbid! For if there had been a law given which could give life, verily justice should have been by the law.
Gala	Haweis	3:21	Is the law then contrary to the promises of God? God forbid. For if there had been a law given which was capable of procuring life, verily righteousness would have been by the law.
Gala	GodsWord	3:21	Does this mean, then, that the laws given to Moses contradict God's promises? That's unthinkable! If those laws could give us life, then certainly we would receive God's approval because we obeyed them.
Gala	KJVPCE	3:21	Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
Gala	NETfree	3:21	Is the law therefore opposed to the promises of God? Absolutely not! For if a law had been given that was able to give life, then righteousness would certainly have come by the law.
Gala	RKJNT	3:21	Is the law then against the promises of God? Absolutely not: for if there had been a law given which could impart life, then righteousness truly would have been through the law.
Gala	AFV2020	3:21	Is the law then contrary to the promises of God? MAY IT NEVER BE! For if a law had been given that had the power to give life, then righteousness would indeed have been by law.
Gala	NHEB	3:21	Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could make alive, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.
Gala	OEBcth	3:21	Does that set the law in opposition to God’s promises? Heaven forbid! For, if a law had been given capable of bestowing life, then righteousness would have actually owed its existence to law.
Gala	NETtext	3:21	Is the law therefore opposed to the promises of God? Absolutely not! For if a law had been given that was able to give life, then righteousness would certainly have come by the law.
Gala	UKJV	3:21	Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
Gala	Noyes	3:21	Is then the Law against the promises of God? Far be it! For if a law had been given which was able to give life, righteousness would indeed have been by the Law;
Gala	KJV	3:21	Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
Gala	KJVA	3:21	Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
Gala	AKJV	3:21	Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, truly righteousness should have been by the law.
Gala	RLT	3:21	Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
Gala	OrthJBC	3:21	Is the Torah, mimeila (resultantly, as a consequence), against the havtachot (promises) of Hashem? Chas v'Shalom (G-d forbid!)! For if Torah had been given that had the ko'ach (power) to affect hitkhadeshut (regeneration), then to be YITZDAK IM HASHEM ("justified with G-d") would indeed have been based on chukim of the Torah.
Gala	MKJV	3:21	Is the Law then against the promises of God? Let it not be said! For if a law had been given which could have given life, indeed righteousness would have been out of Law.
Gala	YLT	3:21	the law, then, is against the promises of God? --let it not be! for if a law was given that was able to make alive, truly by law there would have been the righteousness,
Gala	Murdock	3:21	Is the law then opposed to the promise of God? Far be it. For if a law had been given, which could make alive, certainly, righteousness would have been by the law.
Gala	ACV	3:21	Is the law therefore against the promises of God? May it not happen! For if a law was given that could make alive, truly righteousness would be from law.

Gala	VulgSist	3:21	Lex ergo adversus promissa Dei? Absit. Si enim data esset lex, quae posset vivificare, vere ex lege esset iustitia.
Gala	VulgCont	3:21	Lex ergo adversus promissa Dei? Absit. Si enim data esset lex, quæ posset vivificare, vere ex lege esset iustitia.
Gala	Vulgate	3:21	lex ergo adversus promissa Dei absit si enim data esset lex quae posset vivificare vere ex lege esset iustitia
Gala	VulgHetz	3:21	Lex ergo adversus promissa Dei? Absit. Si enim data esset lex, quæ posset vivificare, vere ex lege esset iustitia.
Gala	VulgClem	3:21	Lex ergo adversus promissa Dei ? Absit. Si enim data esset lex, quæ posset vivificare, vere ex lege esset justitia.

Gala	CzeBKR	3:21	Tedy zákon jest proti slibům Božím? Odstup to. Nebo kdyby byl zákon dán, kterýž by mohl obživiti, jistě z zákona byla by spravedlnost.
Gala	CzeB21	3:21	Je tedy Zákon proti Božím zaslíbením? V žádném případě! Kdyby tu byl Zákon, který by dokázal přinést život, potom by spravedlnost opravdu vyplývala ze Zákona.
Gala	CzeCEP	3:21	Je tedy zákon proti Božím slibům? Naprosto ne! Kdyby tu byl zákon, který by mohl dát život, pak by vskutku spravedlnost byla ze zákona.
Gala	CzeCSP	3:21	Staví se tedy Zákon proti [Božím] zaslíbením? Rozhodně ne! Neboť kdyby byl dán Zákon, který by byl mocen obživit, byla by spravedlnost vskutku ze Zákona.