|
Roma
|
RWebster
|
2:26 |
Therefore if the uncircumcision keepeth the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
EMTV
|
2:26 |
Therefore, if an uncircumcised man keeps the righteous requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
NHEBJE
|
2:26 |
If therefore the uncircumcised keep the ordinances of the law, won't his uncircumcision be accounted as circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
Etheridg
|
2:26 |
But if the uncircumcision shall keep the commandment of the law, is not uncircumcisedness reckoned to him (as) circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
ABP
|
2:26 |
If then the uncircumcised [2the 3ordinances 4of the 5law 1keep], shall not his uncircumcision [2for 3circumcision 1be considered],
|
|
Roma
|
NHEBME
|
2:26 |
If therefore the uncircumcised keep the ordinances of the law, won't his uncircumcision be accounted as circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
Rotherha
|
2:26 |
If then, the uncircumcision, be guarding the righteous requirement of the law, shall not, his uncircumcision, as circumcision be reckoned?—
|
|
Roma
|
LEB
|
2:26 |
Therefore, if the uncircumcised person follows the requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be credited for circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
BWE
|
2:26 |
So if a man who has not been circumcised obeys the law, will he not be like a man who has been circumcised?
|
|
Roma
|
Twenty
|
2:26 |
If, then, an uncircumcised man pays regard to the requirements of the Law, will not he, although not circumcised, be regarded by God as if he were?
|
|
Roma
|
ISV
|
2:26 |
So if a man who is uncircumcised keeps the requirements of the law, his uncircumcision will be regarded as circumcision, won't it?
|
|
Roma
|
RNKJV
|
2:26 |
Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
Jubilee2
|
2:26 |
Therefore if the uncircumcised keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his foreskin be counted for circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
Webster
|
2:26 |
Therefore, if the uncircumcision keepeth the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
Darby
|
2:26 |
If therefore the uncircumcision keep the requirements of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision,
|
|
Roma
|
OEB
|
2:26 |
If, then, an uncircumcised man pays regard to the requirements of the law, will not he, although not circumcised, be regarded by God as if he were?
|
|
Roma
|
ASV
|
2:26 |
If therefore the uncircumcision keep the ordinances of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
Anderson
|
2:26 |
If, then, he who is uncircumcised keeps the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
Godbey
|
2:26 |
Then if uncircumcision may keep the righteousness of the law, will not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
LITV
|
2:26 |
If, then, the uncircumcision keeps the demands of the Law, will not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
Geneva15
|
2:26 |
Therefore if the vncircumcision keepe the ordinances of the Lawe, shall not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
Montgome
|
2:26 |
So if the uncircumcised keeps the ordinance of the Law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned equivalent to circumcision.
|
|
Roma
|
CPDV
|
2:26 |
And so, if the uncircumcised keep the justices of the law, shall not this lack of circumcision be counted as circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
Weymouth
|
2:26 |
In the same way if an uncircumcised man pays attention to the just requirements of the Law, shall not his lack of circumcision be overlooked, and,
|
|
Roma
|
LO
|
2:26 |
And if the uncircumcision keep the precepts of the law, will not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
Common
|
2:26 |
So, if a man who is uncircumcised keeps the requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
BBE
|
2:26 |
If those who have not circumcision keep the rules of the law, will it not be credited to them as circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
Worsley
|
2:26 |
Therefore if the uncircumcised keep the righteous precepts of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be accounted to him for circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
DRC
|
2:26 |
If then, the uncircumcised keep the justices of the law, shall not this uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
Haweis
|
2:26 |
If then the uncircumcision observe the righteous judgments of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be accounted for circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
GodsWord
|
2:26 |
So if a man does what Moses' Teachings demand, won't he be considered circumcised even if he is uncircumcised?
|
|
Roma
|
Tyndale
|
2:26 |
Therfore if the vncircumcised kepe the ryght thinges contayned in the lawe: shall not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
KJVPCE
|
2:26 |
Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
NETfree
|
2:26 |
Therefore if the uncircumcised man obeys the righteous requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
RKJNT
|
2:26 |
Therefore, if the uncircumcised keeps the requirements of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted as circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
AFV2020
|
2:26 |
Therefore, if the uncircumcised is keeping the requirements of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be reckoned for circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
NHEB
|
2:26 |
If therefore the uncircumcised keep the ordinances of the law, won't his uncircumcision be accounted as circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
OEBcth
|
2:26 |
If, then, an uncircumcised man pays regard to the requirements of the law, will not he, although not circumcised, be regarded by God as if he were?
|
|
Roma
|
NETtext
|
2:26 |
Therefore if the uncircumcised man obeys the righteous requirements of the law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
UKJV
|
2:26 |
Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
Noyes
|
2:26 |
If then he who is uncircumcised keep the precepts of the Law, shall not he though uncircumcised be regarded as circumcised?
|
|
Roma
|
KJV
|
2:26 |
Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
KJVA
|
2:26 |
Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
AKJV
|
2:26 |
Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
RLT
|
2:26 |
Therefore if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
OrthJBC
|
2:26 |
If then the ish without bris milah is shomer regarding the just requirements of the Torah (1:32), will not his uncircumcision be counted as bris milah?
|
|
Roma
|
MKJV
|
2:26 |
If then the uncircumcision keeps the ordinances of the Law, shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
YLT
|
2:26 |
If, therefore the uncircumcision the righteousness of the law may keep, shall not his uncircumcision for circumcision be reckoned?
|
|
Roma
|
Murdock
|
2:26 |
And if uncircumcision should keep the precepts of the law, would not that uncircumcision be accounted as circumcision?
|
|
Roma
|
ACV
|
2:26 |
If therefore a man of uncircumcision keeps the ordinances of the law, will not his uncircumcision be considered circumcision?
|