|
b5b993e
|
Colorful demonstrations and weekend marches are vital but alone are not powerful enough to stop wars. Wars will be stopped only when soldiers refuse to fight, when workers refuse to load weapons onto ships and aircraft, when people boycott the economic outposts of Empire that are strung across the globe.
|
|
anti-war
civil-disobedience
non-violence
social-justice
|
Arundhati Roy |
|
5bb6eb0
|
George Bush made a mistake when he referred to the Saddam Hussein regime as 'evil.' Every liberal and leftist knows how to titter at such black-and-white moral absolutism. What the president should have done, in the unlikely event that he wanted the support of America's peace-mongers, was to describe a confrontation with Saddam as the 'lesser evil.' This is a term the Left can appreciate. Indeed, 'lesser evil' is part of the essential tactical rhetoric of today's Left, and has been deployed to excuse or overlook the sins of liberal Democrats, from President Clinton's bombing of Sudan to Madeleine Albright's veto of an international rescue for Rwanda when she was U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. Among those longing for nuance, moral relativism--the willingness to use the term evil, when combined with a willingness to make accommodations with it--is the smart thing: so much more sophisticated than 'cowboy' language.
|
|
al-shifa-pharmaceutical-factory
anti-war
ba-ath-party
bill-clinton
democratic-party-united-states
evil
george-w-bush
iraq
iraq-war
leftism
liberalism
madeleine-albright
moral-absolutism
moral-relativism
morality
opposition-to-the-iraq-war
peace-movement
presidency-of-bill-clinton
presidency-of-george-w-bush
rwanda
rwandan-genocide
saddam-hussein
sudan
united-nations
united-states
|
Christopher Hitchens |
|
570d606
|
"We'll fight back, we'll fight back, we'll fight back," a man near Doctor Stockstill was chanting. Stockstill looked at him in astonishment, wondering who he would fight back against. Things were falling on them; did the man intend to fall back upward into the sky in some sort of revenge?"
|
|
anti-war
atom-bomb
sci-fi
|
Philip K. Dick |
|
4c1ce1d
|
You might think that the Left could have a regime-change perspective of its own, based on solidarity with its comrades abroad. After all, Saddam's ruling Ba'ath Party consolidated its power by first destroying the Iraqi communist and labor movements, and then turning on the Kurds (whose cause, historically, has been one of the main priorities of the Left in the Middle East). When I first became a socialist, the imperative of international solidarity was the essential if not the defining thing, whether the cause was popular or risky or not. I haven't seen an anti-war meeting all this year at which you could even guess at the existence of the Iraqi and Kurdish opposition to Saddam, an opposition that was fighting for 'regime change' when both Republicans and Democrats were fawning over Baghdad as a profitable client and geopolitical ally. Not only does the 'peace' movement ignore the anti-Saddam civilian opposition, it sends missions to console the Ba'athists in their isolation, and speaks of the invader of Kuwait and Iran and the butcher of Kurdistan as if he were the victim and George W. Bush the aggressor.
|
|
anti-war
ba-ath-party
baghdad
communism
democratic-party-united-states
george-w-bush
invasion-of-kuwait
iran-iraq-war
iraq
iraq-war
iraqi-communist-party
iraqi-kurdistan
kurdish-people
kuwait
labour-movement
leftism
middle-east
opposition-to-the-iraq-war
peace-movement
republican-party-united-states
saddam-hussein
socialism
|
Christopher Hitchens |