|
9be0504
|
This is rather as if you imagine a puddle waking up one morning and thinking, 'This is an interesting world I find myself in -- an interesting hole I find myself in -- fits me rather neatly, doesn't it? In fact it fits me staggeringly well, must have been made to have me in it!' This is such a powerful idea that as the sun rises in the sky and the air heats up and as, gradually, the puddle gets smaller and smaller, frantically hanging on to the notion that everything's going to be alright, because this world was meant to have him in it, was built to have him in it; so the moment he disappears catches him rather by surprise. I think this may be something we need to be on the watch out for.
|
|
intelligent-design
puddle
|
Douglas Adams |
|
3679ddb
|
"I want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus, and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you're being had.
|
|
bisphenol-a
bpa
consensus
darwinism
dr-jack-cohen-podiatrist
evolution
excitotoxins
fluoride
global-warming
id
intelligent-design
macro-evolution
macroevolution
majority
majority-view
man-made-global-warming
manmade-global-warming
minority
minority-view
monosodium-glutamate
msg
science
scientific-discovery
scientific-inquiry
scientific-method
scientific-process
scientific-research
scientific-revolution
scientific-theory
september-11-attacks
|
Michael Crichton |
|
427b969
|
"Scientists are slowly waking up to an inconvenient truth - the universe looks suspiciously like a fix. The issue concerns the very laws of nature themselves. For 40 years, physicists and cosmologists have been quietly collecting examples of all too convenient "coincidences" and special features in the underlying laws of the universe that seem to be necessary in order for life, and hence conscious beings, to exist. Change any one of them and the consequences would be lethal. , the distinguished cosmologist, once said it was as if "a super-intellect has monkeyed with physics".
|
|
chance
coincidence
fine-tuning
fred-hoyle
id
intelligent-design
science
serendipity
theism
|
Paul Davies |
|
cac6115
|
"There is no indisputable proof for the big bang," said Hollus. "And there is none for evolution. And yet you accept those. Why hold the question of whether there is a creator to a higher standard?"
|
|
big-bang
darwinism
double-standards
id
intelligent-design
macro-evolution
macroevolution
materialism
naturalism
religious-science-fiction
science
theism
theistic-science-fiction
|
Robert J. Sawyer |
|
f2df499
|
Allow intelligent design into science textbooks, lecture halls, and laboratories, and the cost to the frontier of scientific discovery--the frontier that drives the economies of the future--would be incalculable. I don't want students who could make the next major breakthrough in renewable energy sources or space travel to have been taught that anything they don't understand, and that nobody yet understands, is divinely constructed and therefore beyond their intellectual capacity. The day that happens, Americans will just sit in awe of what we don't understand, while we watch the rest of the world boldly go where no mortal has gone before.
|
|
intellect
intelligent-design
reason
research
|
Neil deGrasse Tyson |
|
3cfa16e
|
"It is either coincidence piled on top of coincidence," said Hollus, "or it is deliberate design."
|
|
chance
coincidenc-e
fine-tuning
id
intelligent-design
naturalism
religious-science-fiction
science
theism
theistic-science-fiction
|
Robert J. Sawyer |
|
f0335ba
|
people believe in God because the world is very complicated and they think it is very unlikely that anything as complicated as a flying squirrel or the human eye or a brain could happen by chance.
|
|
intelligent-design
|
Mark Haddon |
|
88c6339
|
"Even if we have a reliable criterion for detecting design, and even if that criterion tells us that biological systems are designed, it seems that determining a biological system to be designed is akin to shrugging our shoulders and saying God did it. The fear is that admitting design as an explanation will stifle scientific inquiry, that scientists will stop investigating difficult problems because they have a sufficient explanation already. But design is not a science stopper. Indeed, design can foster inquiry where traditional evolutionary approaches obstruct it. Consider the term "junk DNA." Implicit in this term is the view that because the genome of an organism has been cobbled together through a long, undirected evolutionary process, the genome is a patchwork of which only limited portions are essential to the organism. Thus on an evolutionary view we expect a lot of useless DNA. If, on the other hand, organisms are designed, we expect DNA, as much as possible, to exhibit function. And indeed, the most recent findings suggest that designating DNA as "junk" merely cloaks our current lack of knowledge about function. For instance, in a recent issue of the , John Bodnar describes how "non-coding DNA in eukaryotic genomes encodes a language which programs organismal growth and development." Design encourages scientists to look for function where evolution discourages it.
|
|
biology
coccyx
darwinism
dna
evolution
human-appendix
human-coccyx
id
intelligent-design
junk-dna
purpose
science
scientific-prediction
vestigial-organs
|
William A. Dembski |
|
8a4826a
|
No one disputes that seeming order can come out of the application of simple rules. But who wrote the rules?
|
|
intelligent-design
naturalism
religious-science-fiction
science
theism
theistic-science-fiction
|
Robert J. Sawyer |
|
8fa5997
|
"New Rule: You don't have to teach both sides of a debate if one side is a load of crap. President Bush recently suggested that public schools should teach "intelligent design" alongside the theory of evolution, because after all, evolution is "just a theory." Then the president renewed his vow to "drive the terrorists straight over the edge of the earth." Here's what I don't get: President Bush is a brilliant scientist. He's the man who proved you could mix two parts booze with one part cocaine and still fly a jet fighter. And yet he just can't seem to accept that we descended from apes. It seems pathetic to be so insecure about your biological superiority to a group of feces-flinging, rouge-buttocked monkeys that you have to make up fairy tales like "We came from Adam and Eve," and then cover stories for Adam and Eve, Yeah, leaving the earth in the hands of two naked teenagers, that's a real intelligent design. I'm sorry, folks, but it may very well be that life is just a series of random events, and that there is no master plan--but enough about Iraq. There aren't necessarily two sides to every issue. If there were, the Republicans would have an opposition party. And an opposition party would point out that even though there's a debate in schools and government about this, there is no debate among scientists. Evolution is supported by the entire scientific community. Intelligent design is supported by the guys on line to see And the reason there is no real debate is that intelligent design isn't real science. It's the equivalent of saying that the Thermos keeps hot things hot and cold things cold because it's a god. It's so willfully ignorant you might as well worship the U.S. mail. "It came again! Praise Jesus!" Stupidity isn't a form of knowing things. Thunder is high-pressure air meeting low-pressure air--it's not God bowling. "Babies come from storks" is not a competing school of throught in medical school. We shouldn't teach both. The media shouldn't equate both. If Thomas Jefferson knew we were blurring the line this much between Church and State, he would turn over in his slave. As for me, I believe in evolution intelligent design. I think God designed us in his image, but I also think God is a monkey."
|
|
creationism
essay
evolution
george-w-bush
intelligent-design
politics
religion
science
separation-of-church-and-state
|
Bill Maher |
|
1d79afa
|
Constrained optimization is the art of compromise between conflicting objectives. This is what design is all about. To find fault with biological design - as Stephen Jay Gould regularly does - because it misses some idealized optimum is therefore gratuitous. Not knowing the objectives of the designer, Gould is in no position to say whether the designer has proposed a faulty compromise among those objectives.
|
|
biology
id
intelligent-design
optimisation
optimization
perfection
science
stephen-jay-gould
|
William A. Dembski |
|
3bd0efd
|
Many investigators feel uneasy stating in public that the origin of life is a mystery, even though behind closed doors they admit they are baffled.
|
|
biology
chemical-evolution
darwinism
evolution
id
intelligent-design
origin-of-information
origin-of-life
science
|
Paul Davies |
|
215fef6
|
"The problem with ID, of course, is that it leaves open the possibility that the intelligence behind nature may have a moral interest in us, having communicated already with humanity in the past, and might try to boss you around in your private affairs.
|
|
aliens
dawkins
extraterrestrials
id
intelligent-design
judgement
moral-responsibility
multiple-universe
multiple-universes
multiverse
new-scientist
responsibility
richard-dawkins
science
theism
|
David Klinghoffer |
|
1b4f8c7
|
What was the power that turned the worm into a moth? It was greater than any power the Builders had had, he was sure of that. The power that ran the city of Ember was feeble by comparison...
|
|
intelligent-design
life
power
|
Jeanne DuPrau |