0913af8
|
At my glummest, I sometimes think women get to chose- between being punished for being unsubjugated and the continual punishment of subjugation.
|
|
modern-society
subjugation
|
Rebecca Solnit |
f2e0593
|
[In 16th century European society] Marriage was the triumphal arch through which women, almost without exception, had to pass in order to reach the public eye. And after marriage followed, in theory, the total self-abnegation of the woman.
|
|
empowerment
feminism
gender
history
independence
inequality
marriage
married-life
matrimony
men
misogyny
perception
self-abnegation
self-determination
social-norms
subjugation
wedlock
women
women-s-rights
|
Antonia Fraser |
84dff39
|
Above all, it seems to me wrongheaded and dangerous to invoke historical assumptions about environmental practices of native peoples in order to justify treating them fairly. ... By invoking this assumption [i.e., that they were/are better environmental stewards than other peoples or parts of contemporary society] to justify fair treatment of native peoples, we imply that it would be OK to mistreat them if that assumption could be refuted. In fact, the case against mistreating them isn't based on any historical assumption about their environmental practices: it's based on a moral principle, namely, that it is morally wrong for one people to dispossess, subjugate or exterminate another people.
|
|
dispossession
environment
equality
extermination
morality
native-americans
subjugation
suppression
values
|
Jared Diamond |
69fcb91
|
It was a fact generally acknowledged by all but the most contumacious spirits at the beginning of the seventeenth century that woman was the weaker vessel; weaker than man, that is. ... That was the way God had arranged Creation, sanctified in the words of the Apostle. ... Under the common law of England at the accession of King James I, no female had any rights at all (if some were allowed by custom). As an unmarried woman her rights were swallowed up in her father's, and she was his to dispose of in marriage at will. Once she was married her property became absolutely that of her husband. What of those who did not marry? Common law met that problem blandly by not recognizing it. In the words of [the leading 17th century compendium on women's legal status]: 'All of them are understood either married or to be married.' In 1603 England, in short, still lived in a world governed by feudal law, where a wife passed from the guardianship of her father to her husband; her husband also stood in relation to her as a feudal lord.
|
|
common-law
empowerment
fathers
feminism
feudalism
gender
guardianship
history
husbands
independence
inequality
marriage
married-life
matrimony
men
misogyny
property
self-determination
social-norms
subjugation
wedlock
women
women-s-rights
|
Antonia Fraser |
b9d5bdb
|
Whom the gods notice they destroy. Be small... and you will escape the jealousy of the great.
|
|
resignation
subjugation
|
Philip K. Dick |