|
Hebr
|
RWebster
|
7:11 |
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
EMTV
|
7:11 |
Therefore, if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), why is there yet a need for another priest to rise, after the order of Melchizedek, and not to be called after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
NHEBJE
|
7:11 |
Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
Etheridg
|
7:11 |
If, therefore, Perfection were to be through the priesthood of the Levoyee, by which the law has been put upon the people, why was there another Priest required, who should arise in the resemblance of Malki-Zedek? For he had said, In the likeness of Aharun he shall be.
|
|
Hebr
|
ABP
|
7:11 |
If indeed then perfection [2through 3the 4Levitical 5priesthood 1were] ([2the 3people 1for 5upon 6it 4established law],) what still need was there [4according to 5the 6order 7of Melchisedek 1for another 3to arise 2priest], and not [2according to 3the 4order 5of Aaron 1to be named]?
|
|
Hebr
|
NHEBME
|
7:11 |
Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
Rotherha
|
7:11 |
If indeed, therefore, there had been, a perfecting through means of the Levitical priesthood,—for, the people, thereon, have had based a code of laws, what further need, according to the rank of Melchizedek, for a different priest to be raised up, and, not according to the rank of Aaron, to be designated?
|
|
Hebr
|
LEB
|
7:11 |
Thus if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood, for on the basis of it the people received the law, what further need is there for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek and not said to be according to the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
BWE
|
7:11 |
It was while the sons of Levi were priests that the law was made for the people. If those priests were good enough, why would another priest need to come who was like Melchizedek? Why would he not be like Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
Twenty
|
7:11 |
If, then, Perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood--and it was under this priesthood that the people received the Law--why was it still necessary that a priest of a different order should appear, a priest of the order of Melchizedek and not of the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
ISV
|
7:11 |
Now if perfection could have been attained through the Levitical priesthood—for on this basis the people received the law—what further need would there be to speak of appointing another kind of priest according to the order of Melchizedek, not one according to the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
RNKJV
|
7:11 |
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
Jubilee2
|
7:11 |
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need [was there] that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec and not be called after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
Webster
|
7:11 |
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law) what further need [was there] that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
Darby
|
7:11 |
If indeed then perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, for the people had their law given to them in connexion with it, what need [was there] still that a different priest should arise according to the order of Melchisedec, and not be named after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
OEB
|
7:11 |
If, then, perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood — and it was under this priesthood that the people received the law — why was it still necessary that a priest of a different order should appear, a priest of the order of Melchizedek and not of the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
ASV
|
7:11 |
Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it hath the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be reckoned after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
Anderson
|
7:11 |
If, then, there had been a perfect expiation by means of the Levitical priesthood, (for with reference to it, the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should be raised up after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
Godbey
|
7:11 |
Then indeed if perfection was through the Levitical priesthood, for unto it the people have been tithed, what need is there still that another priest shall rise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
LITV
|
7:11 |
Truly, then, if perfection was through the Levitical priestly office (for the people had been given Law under it), why yet need for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek and not to be called according to the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
Geneva15
|
7:11 |
If therefore perfection had bene by the Priesthoode of the Leuites (for vnder it the Lawe was established to the people) what needed it furthermore, that another Priest should rise after the order of Melchi-sedec, and not to be called after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
Montgome
|
7:11 |
Now if there were perfection through the Levitical priesthood, (and it was under it that the people received the Law) why was it still necessary for another kind of priest to arise, after the order of Melchisedek, instead of being reckoned according to the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
CPDV
|
7:11 |
Therefore, if consummation had occurred through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), then what further need would there be for another Priest to rise up according to the order of Melchizedek, one who was not called according to the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
Weymouth
|
7:11 |
Now if the crowning blessing was attainable by means of the Levitical priesthood--for as resting on this foundation the people received the Law, to which they are still subject-- what further need was there for a Priest of a different kind to be raised up belonging to the order of Melchizedek instead of being said to belong to the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
LO
|
7:11 |
Moreover, if, indeed, perfection were through the Levitical priesthood, (for with it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should arise, according to the order of Melchisedec, and not be called according to the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
Common
|
7:11 |
Now if perfection could have been through the Levitical priesthood (for on the basis of it the people received the Law), what further need was there for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not one designated according to the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
BBE
|
7:11 |
Now if it was possible for things to be made complete through the priests of the house of Levi (for the law was given to the people in connection with them), what need was there for another priest who was of the order of Melchizedek and not of the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
Worsley
|
7:11 |
Now if perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law) what farther need was there that another priest should arise after the order of Melchisedec, and not after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
DRC
|
7:11 |
If then perfection was by the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need was there that another priest should rise according to the order of Melchisedech: and not be called according to the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
Haweis
|
7:11 |
If therefore there was perfection by the Levitical priesthood (for under that the people had the law given to them), what farther need was there that another priest should arise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
GodsWord
|
7:11 |
The people established the Levitical priesthood based on instructions they received. If the work of the Levitical priests had been perfect, we wouldn't need to speak about another kind of priest. However, we speak about another kind of priest, a priest like Melchizedek, not a Levitical priest like Aaron.
|
|
Hebr
|
Tyndale
|
7:11 |
Yf now therfore perfeccion came by the presthod of the levites (for vnder that presthod the people recaved the lawe) what neded it furthermore that an other prest shuld ryse after the order of Melchisedech and not after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
KJVPCE
|
7:11 |
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
NETfree
|
7:11 |
So if perfection had in fact been possible through the Levitical priesthood - for on that basis the people received the law - what further need would there have been for another priest to arise, said to be in the order of Melchizedek and not in Aaron's order?
|
|
Hebr
|
RKJNT
|
7:11 |
Therefore, if perfection was from the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there for another priest to arise, in the order of Melchizedek, and not in the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
AFV2020
|
7:11 |
Therefore, if perfection was indeed possible through the Levitical priesthood— for the law that the people had received was based on it—what further need was there for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchisedec, and not to be named after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
NHEB
|
7:11 |
Now if there was perfection through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people have received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
OEBcth
|
7:11 |
If, then, perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood — and it was under this priesthood that the people received the law — why was it still necessary that a priest of a different order should appear, a priest of the order of Melchizedek and not of the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
NETtext
|
7:11 |
So if perfection had in fact been possible through the Levitical priesthood - for on that basis the people received the law - what further need would there have been for another priest to arise, said to be in the order of Melchizedek and not in Aaron's order?
|
|
Hebr
|
UKJV
|
7:11 |
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
Noyes
|
7:11 |
If indeed perfection had been by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people hath received the Law,) what further need was there that a different priest should arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called alter the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
KJV
|
7:11 |
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
KJVA
|
7:11 |
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
AKJV
|
7:11 |
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
RLT
|
7:11 |
If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
OrthJBC
|
7:11 |
Now if shleimut (completeness) had been attainable through the Kehunah of Levy--for under it came the Mattan Torah (giving of the Torah) to the Am Berit--what further need would there have been to speak of another Kohen arising AL DIVRATI MALKI-TZEDEK ("according to the order of Malki-Tzedek" --Tehillim 110:4) rather than "al divrati Aharon"?
|
|
Hebr
|
MKJV
|
7:11 |
Therefore if perfection were by the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the Law), what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
YLT
|
7:11 |
If indeed, then, perfection were through the Levitical priesthood--for the people under it had received law--what further need, according to the order of Melchisedek, for another priest to arise, and not to be called according to the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
Murdock
|
7:11 |
If, therefore, perfection had been by means of the priesthood of the Levites, in which the law was enjoined on the people; why was another priest required, who should stand up after the likeness of Melchisedec? For it should have said, He shall be after the likeness of Aaron.
|
|
Hebr
|
ACV
|
7:11 |
If indeed therefore perfection was through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people had received the law), what further need is there for another priest to arise according to the order of Melchizedek, and not be designated according to the order of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
PorBLivr
|
7:11 |
Portanto, se a perfeição tivesse sido de fato pelo sacerdócio Levítico (pois com base nele o povo recebeu a Lei), que mais necessidade havia de se levantar outro Sacerdote segundo a ordem de Melquisedeque, e não ser chamado segundo a ordem de Arão?
|
|
Hebr
|
Mg1865
|
7:11 |
Koa raha nisy fanatanterahana tamin’ ny fisoronan’ i Levy (fa tamin’ izany no nahazoan’ ny olona ny lalàna), ahoana no mbola ilana mpisorona hafa hiseho araka ny fanaon’ i Melkizedeka ihany, izay tsy hotononina ho araka ny fanaon’ i Arona?
|
|
Hebr
|
CopNT
|
7:11 |
ⲓⲥϫⲉ ⲙⲉⲛ ⲟⲩⲛ ⲛⲁⲣⲉ ⳿ⲡϫⲱⲕ ⳿ⲉⲃⲟⲗ ϣⲟⲡ ⲡⲉ ⳿ⲉⲃⲟⲗ ϩⲓⲧⲉⲛ ϯⲙⲉⲧⲟⲩⲏⲃ ⳿ⲛⲧⲉ ⲡⲓⲗⲉⲩⲓⲧⲏ ⲥ ⲉⲧⲁⲩϯ ⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ ⲅⲁⲣ ⳿ⲙⲡⲓⲗⲁⲟⲥ ϩⲓⲱⲧⲥ ⲓⲉ ⲛⲉ ⳿ⲧⲭⲣⲓⲁ ⲟⲩ ⲧⲉ ⲕⲁⲧⲁ ⳿ⲧⲧⲁⲝⲓⲥ ⳿ⲙⲙⲉⲗⲭⲓⲥⲉⲇⲉⲕ ⲉⲑⲣⲉϥϣⲱⲡⲓ ⳿ⲛϫⲉ ⲕⲉⲟⲩⲏⲃ ⲟⲩⲟϩ ⲉⲛⲉϫⲟⲥ ⲁⲛ ϫⲉ ⲕⲁⲧⲁ ⳿ⲧⲧⲁⲝⲓⲥ ⳿ⲛ⳿ⲁ⳿ⲁⲣⲱⲛ.
|
|
Hebr
|
FinPR
|
7:11 |
Jos siis täydellisyys olisi saavutettu leeviläisen pappeuden kautta, sillä tähän on kansa laissa sidottu, miksi sitten oli tarpeen, että nousi toinen pappi Melkisedekin järjestyksen mukaan eikä tullut nimitetyksi Aaronin järjestyksen mukaan?
|
|
Hebr
|
NorBroed
|
7:11 |
Hvis, virkelig, derfor, det var en fullendelse gjennom det Levittiske presteembete, for folket under det hadde blitt gitt en lov, hvilket fremdeles behov for en annen prest å stå opp i henhold til Melkisedeks ordning, og ikke å bli kalt i henhold til Arons ordning?
|
|
Hebr
|
FinRK
|
7:11 |
Jos siis täydellisyys olisi saavutettu leeviläisen pappeuden kautta, johon laki sitoi kansan, miksi sitten oli vielä tarpeen, että nousi toinen pappi Melkisedekin järjestyksen mukaan eikä häntä nimitetty Aaronin järjestyksen mukaan?
|
|
Hebr
|
ChiSB
|
7:11 |
那時，如果藉著肋未司祭職能有成全──因為選民就是本著這司祭職接受了法律──為什麼還須要興起另一位，按照默基瑟德品位的司祭，而不稱為亞郎的品位呢﹖
|
|
Hebr
|
CopSahBi
|
7:11 |
ⲉⲛⲉⲟⲩⲛ ⲟⲩϫⲱⲕ ϭⲉ ⲉⲃⲟⲗ ϣⲟⲟⲡ ⲛⲧⲙⲛⲧⲟⲩⲏⲏⲃ ⲛⲗⲉⲩⲉⲓ ⲡⲗⲁⲟⲥ ⲅⲁⲣ ⲉⲛⲧⲁϥϫⲓ ⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ ϩⲓⲱⲱⲥ ⲛⲉⲟⲩ ⲧⲉ ⲧⲉⲭⲣⲓⲁ ⲉⲧⲣⲉϥⲧⲱⲟⲩⲛ ⲛϭⲓ ⲕⲉⲟⲩⲏⲏⲃ ⲕⲁⲧⲁ ⲧⲧⲁⲝⲓⲥ ⲙⲙⲉⲗⲭⲓⲥⲉⲇⲉⲕ ⲁⲩⲱ ⲛⲥⲉⲧⲙϫⲟⲟⲥ ϫⲉ ⲕⲁⲧⲁ ⲧⲧⲁⲝⲓⲥ ⲛⲁⲁⲣⲱⲛ
|
|
Hebr
|
ChiUns
|
7:11 |
从前百姓在利未人祭司职任以下受律法，倘若藉这职任能得完全，又何用另外兴起一位祭司，照麦基洗德的等次，不照亚伦的等次呢？
|
|
Hebr
|
BulVeren
|
7:11 |
И така, ако можеше да има съвършенство чрез левитското свещенство – защото под него народът получи закона – каква нужда е имало още да се издига друг свещеник, според Мелхиседековия чин, и да не се определя такъв според Аароновия чин?
|
|
Hebr
|
AraSVD
|
7:11 |
فَلَوْ كَانَ بِٱلْكَهَنُوتِ ٱللَّاوِيِّ كَمَالٌ - إِذِ ٱلشَّعْبُ أَخَذَ ٱلنَّامُوسَ عَلَيْهِ - مَاذَا كَانَتِ ٱلْحَاجَةُ بَعْدُ إِلَى أَنْ يَقُومَ كَاهِنٌ آخَرُ عَلَى رُتْبَةِ مَلْكِي صَادَقَ؟ وَلَا يُقَالُ عَلَى رُتْبَةِ هَارُونَ.
|
|
Hebr
|
Shona
|
7:11 |
Naizvozvo, kana kupedzeredzwa kwaivapo neupristi hwaRevhi (nokuti pasi pahwo vanhu rwakapiwa murairo), ko umwe mupristi waifanira kuzomukirei kubva kurudzi rwaMerikizedheki, uye asingaidzwi werudzi rwaAroni?
|
|
Hebr
|
Esperant
|
7:11 |
Tial, se ekzistis perfekteco per la Levida pastreco (ĉar sub ĝi la popolo ricevis la leĝon), kia plua bezono estis, ke leviĝu alia pastro laŭ la maniero de Melkicedek, kaj ne estu nomata laŭ la maniero de Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
ThaiKJV
|
7:11 |
เหตุฉะนั้นถ้าเมื่อจะถึงความสำเร็จได้ในทางตำแหน่งปุโรหิตที่สืบมาจากตระกูลเลวี (ด้วยว่าประชาชนได้รับพระราชบัญญัติโดยทางตำแหน่งนี้) ที่ไหนจะต้องการให้มีปุโรหิตอีกตามอย่างเมลคีเซเดคเล่า ซึ่งมิได้เรียกตามอย่างอาโรน
|
|
Hebr
|
BurJudso
|
7:11 |
တနည်းကား၊ လေဝိမှဆင်းသက်သော ယဇ်ပုရောဟိတ်အမျိုးနှင့် စပ်ဆိုင်လျက်လူများတို့သည် ပညတ်တရားတော်ကို ခံကြသောကြောင့်၊ ထိုအမျိုးအားဖြင့် စုံလင်ခြင်းသို့ ရောက်နိုင်သည်မှန်လျှင်၊ အခြား သော ယဇ်ပုရောဟိတ်သည်၊ အာရုန်နည်းတူ မခေါ်ဝေါ်ဘဲ၊ မေလခိဇေဒက်နည်းတူ ပေါ်ထွန်းစရာအကြောင်း အဘယ်သို့ရှိသေးသနည်း။
|
|
Hebr
|
SBLGNT
|
7:11 |
Εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευιτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν, ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπʼ ⸀αὐτῆς ⸀νενομοθέτηται, τίς ἔτι χρεία κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισέδεκ ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι;
|
|
Hebr
|
FarTPV
|
7:11 |
حال اگر كمال به وسیلهٔ كاهنان رتبهٔ لاوی میسّر میشد، (فراموش نشود كه در دوران این كاهنان، شریعت به مردم داده شد.) چه نیازی بود به ظهور كاهن دیگری به رتبهٔ ملکیصدق و نه به رتبهٔ هارون؟
|
|
Hebr
|
UrduGeoR
|
7:11 |
Agar Lāwī kī kahānat (jis par sharīat mabnī thī) kāmiliyat paidā kar saktī to phir ek aur qism ke imām kī kyā zarūrat hotī, us kī jo Hārūn jaisā na ho balki Malik-e-sidq jaisā?
|
|
Hebr
|
SweFolk
|
7:11 |
Om nu fullkomlighet hade gått att nå genom den levitiska prästtjänsten – och på den grunden fick folket lagen – varför måste det då uppstå en annan präst, en som Melkisedek, en som inte sägs vara som Aron?
|
|
Hebr
|
TNT
|
7:11 |
εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευϊτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν, (ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπ᾽ αὐτῆς νενομοθέτηται,) τίς ἔτι χρεία κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισεδὲκ ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι;
|
|
Hebr
|
GerSch
|
7:11 |
Wenn nun das Vollkommenheit wäre, was durch das levitische Priestertum kam (denn unter diesem hat das Volk das Gesetz empfangen), wozu wäre es noch nötig, daß ein anderer Priester »nach der Ordnung Melchisedeks« auftrete und nicht einer »nach der Ordnung Aarons« bezeichnet werde?
|
|
Hebr
|
TagAngBi
|
7:11 |
Ngayon kung may kasakdalan nga sa pamamagitan ng pagkasaserdote ng mga Levita (sapagka't sa ilalim nito ay tinanggap ng bayan ang kautusan), anong kailangan pa na magbangon ang ibang saserdote, ayon sa pagkasaserdote ni Melquisedec at hindi ibilang ayon sa pagkasaserdote ni Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
FinSTLK2
|
7:11 |
Jos siis täydellisyys olisi leeviläisen pappeuden kautta, sillä tähän on kansa laissa sidottu, miksi oli vielä tarpeen, että nousi toinen pappi Melkisedekin järjestyksen mukaan eikä tullut nimitetyksi Aaronin järjestyksen mukaan? .
|
|
Hebr
|
Dari
|
7:11 |
حال اگر کمال به وسیلۀ کاهنان رتبۀ لاوی مسیر می شد، (فراموش نشود که در دوران این کاهنان شریعت به مردم داده شد) چه نیازی بود، به ظهور کاهن دیگری به رتبۀ ملکیزدق و نه به رتبۀ هارون؟
|
|
Hebr
|
SomKQA
|
7:11 |
Haddaba haddii kaamilnimo ku jirtay wadaadnimadii Laawi, waayo, iyada ayuu dadku sharciga ka hoos helaye, maxaa weli loogu baahnaa in wadaad kale ka kaco derejadii Malkisadaq oo aan lagu magacaabin derejadii Haaruun?
|
|
Hebr
|
NorSMB
|
7:11 |
Var det då fullkomenskap å vinna ved det levitiske prestedømet - for det var folket bunde til ved lovi - kvi turvest det då at ein annan prest skulde verta uppstelt etter Melkisedeks vis og ikkje verta nemnd etter Arons vis?
|
|
Hebr
|
Alb
|
7:11 |
Sepse, po të ishte përkryerja me anë të priftërisë levitike (sepse populli e mori ligji nën atë), ç'nevojë kishte të dilte një prift tjetër sipas rendit të Melkisedekut dhe të mos caktohet sipas rendit të Aaronit?
|
|
Hebr
|
GerLeoRP
|
7:11 |
Wenn nun Vollkommenheit durch das levitische Priestertum bestünde (schließlich hat das Volk darunter das Gesetz erhalten), welche Notwendigkeit [gäbe es] noch, dass ein anderer Priester „nach der Ordnung Melchisedeks“ aufsteht und nicht [einer] „nach der Ordnung Aarons“ benannt wird?
|
|
Hebr
|
UyCyr
|
7:11 |
Исраил хәлқигә чүширилгән Тәврат қанунидики роһанийлиқ түзүми лавий қәбилисиниң роһанийлири арқилиқ жүргүзүләтти. Бирақ әгәр Худаниң инсанларни гунадин пак қилиш мәхсити бу роһанийлар арқилиқ әмәлгә ашқан болса, ундақта бу хил түзүм асасида тайинланған Һарундәк тәртиптики әмәс, бәлки Малкисидиқтәк тәртиптики йәнә бир роһанийниң келишиниң немә һаҗити бар еди?
|
|
Hebr
|
KorHKJV
|
7:11 |
그러므로 만일 레위의 제사장 체계를 통해 완전함이 있을 수 있었으면 (백성이 그의 제사장 체계 하에서 율법을 받았느니라) 아론의 계통에 따라 부르심을 받지 아니하고 멜기세덱의 계통을 따르는 다른 제사장이 일어날 필요가 또 있었겠느냐?
|
|
Hebr
|
MorphGNT
|
7:11 |
Εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευιτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν, ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπ’ ⸀αὐτῆς ⸀νενομοθέτηται, τίς ἔτι χρεία κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισέδεκ ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι;
|
|
Hebr
|
SrKDIjek
|
7:11 |
Ако је дакле савршенство постало кроз Левитско свештенство (јер је народ под њим закон примио), кака је још потреба била говорити да ће други свештеник постати по реду Мелхиседекову а не по реду Аронову?
|
|
Hebr
|
Wycliffe
|
7:11 |
Therfor if perfeccioun was bi the preesthood of Leuy, for vndur hym the puple took the lawe, what yit was it nedeful, another preest to rise, bi the ordre of Melchisedech, and not to be seid bi the ordre of Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
Mal1910
|
7:11 |
ലേവ്യപൌരോഹിത്യത്താൽ സമ്പൂൎണ്ണത വന്നെങ്കിൽ — അതിൻ കീഴല്ലോ ജനം ന്യായപ്രമാണം പ്രാപിച്ചതു — അഹരോന്റെ ക്രമപ്രകാരം എന്നു പറയാതെ മൽക്കീസേദെക്കിന്റെ ക്രമപ്രകാരം വേറൊരു പുരോഹിതൻ വരുവാൻ എന്തൊരാവശ്യം?
|
|
Hebr
|
KorRV
|
7:11 |
레위 계통의 제사 직분으로 말미암아 온전함을 얻을 수 있었으면 (백성이 그 아래서 율법을 받았으니) 어찌하여 아론의 반차를 좇지 않고 멜기세덱의 반차를 좇는 별다른 한 제사장을 세울 필요가 있느뇨
|
|
Hebr
|
Azeri
|
7:11 |
بلجه، اگر کامئللئک لاوئليلرئن کاهئنلئيئله اولسايدي (چونکي اونون اساسينا گؤره خالق شرئعتي آلديلار)، بس داها نه احتئياج وار ائدي کي، آيري بئر کاهئن هارون ترتئبئنه گؤره تعيئن اولونماييب، ملکئصدق ترتئبئنه گؤره ظوهور اتسئن؟
|
|
Hebr
|
SweKarlX
|
7:11 |
Är nu fullkomlighet skedd genom det Levitiska presterskapet, ty derunder fick folket lagen; hwad behöfde sägas, att en annan prest uppkomma skulle, efter Melchisedeks sätt, och icke efter Arons sätt?
|
|
Hebr
|
KLV
|
7:11 |
DaH chugh pa' ghaHta' perfection vegh the Levitical priesthood ( vaD bIng 'oH the ghotpu ghaj Hevta' the chut), nuq further need ghaHta' pa' vaD another lalDan vumwI' Daq Hu' after the order vo' Melchizedek, je ghobe' taH ja' after the order vo' Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
ItaDio
|
7:11 |
Se adunque la perfezione era per il sacerdozio levitico poichè in su quello fu data la legge al popolo, che era egli più bisogno che sorgesse un altro sacerdote secondo l’ordine di Melchisedec, e che non fosse nominato secondo l’ordine d’Aaronne?
|
|
Hebr
|
RusSynod
|
7:11 |
Итак, если бы совершенство достигалось посредством левитского священства, — ибо с ним сопряжен закон народа, — то какая бы еще нужда была восставать иному священнику по чину Мелхиседека, а не по чину Аарона именоваться?
|
|
Hebr
|
CSlEliza
|
7:11 |
Аще убо совершенство левитским священством было, людие бо на нем взаконени быша: кая еще потреба по чину Мелхиседекову иному востати священнику, а не по чину Ааронову глаголатися?
|
|
Hebr
|
ABPGRK
|
7:11 |
ει μεν ούν τελείωσις διά της Λευϊτικής ιερωσύνης ην ο λαός γαρ επ΄ αυτή νενομοθέτητο τις έτι χρεία κατά την τάξιν Μελχισεδέκ έτερον ανίστασθαι ιερέα και ου κατά την τάξιν Ααρών λέγεσθαι
|
|
Hebr
|
FreBBB
|
7:11 |
Si donc l'on pouvait arriver à la perfection par le sacerdoce lévitique (car le peuple avait reçu une loi fondée sur celui-ci), qu'était-il encore besoin qu'il s'élevât un autre sacrificateur, selon l'ordre de Melchisédek, et qui ne fût pas nommé selon l'ordre d'Aaron ?
|
|
Hebr
|
LinVB
|
7:11 |
Israél, ekólo ya Nzámbe, ezwákí bonganga Nzámbe bwa Lévi elongó na Mobéko. Bôngó, sókó bonganga Nzámbe bôná bozalákí nsúka ya bonganga Nzámbe, boye bobongísí mánso nyé, mpô níni Nzámbe atíí nganga Nzámbe mosúsu wa loléngé la Melkísedek, wa loléngé la Aróne té ?
|
|
Hebr
|
BurCBCM
|
7:11 |
လူအများတို့သည် လေဝိမှဆင်းသက်သောရဟန်း အမျိုးအနွယ်မှတစ်ဆင့် ပညတ်တရားကိုရရှိခဲ့ကြ၏။ လူတို့သည် ဤရဟန်းမျိုး အားဖြင့် စုံလင်ခြင်းသို့ ရောက်နိုင် ခဲ့ပါလျှင် အဘယ်ကြောင့် အာရွန်၏ရဟန်းအမျိုးအနွယ်ထက် မေလ်ခိဇေဒက်၏ ရဟန်းအမျိုးအနွယ်မှ အခြား သောရဟန်းတစ်ပါးကို လိုအပ်သနည်း။-
|
|
Hebr
|
Che1860
|
7:11 |
ᎾᏍᎩ ᎢᏳᏍᏗ ᎢᏳᏃ ᎠᏥᎸᎨᎳᏍᏗ ᎨᏒ ᎠᏂᎵᏫ ᏥᎨᎦᏒᎦᎶᏕ, ᏅᏍᎦᏅᎾ ᎢᎬᏩᏓᏛᏁᏗ ᏱᎨᏎᎢ, (ᎠᏥᎸ-ᎨᎳᏍᏗᏰᏃ ᎨᏒ ᎠᎴ ᏗᎧᎿᎭᏩᏛᏍᏗ ᏚᎾᏚᏓᏖ ᏴᏫ ᎦᎾᏓᏂᎸᏨ) ᎦᏙᏃ ᎠᏏ ᎤᏚᎸᏗ ᏂᎦᎵᏍᏗᏍᎨ ᏅᏩᏓᎴ ᎠᏥᎸᎨᎶᎯ ᎤᎾᏄᎪᎢᏍᏗᏱ ᎹᎵᎩᏏᏕᎩ ᏄᏍᏛ ᎾᏍᎩᏯᎢ, ᎡᎳᏂᏃ ᎾᏍᎩᏯ ᎦᏰᎪᏎᏗ ᏂᎨᏒᎾ ᎨᏒᎢ?
|
|
Hebr
|
ChiUnL
|
7:11 |
昔民在利未人祭司職下受律、若由之得完全、則何須別興一祭司、依麥基洗德之班、而不謂之依亞倫班乎、
|
|
Hebr
|
VietNVB
|
7:11 |
Nếu có thể nhờ chức vị tế lễ của Lê-vi mà được toàn hảo, vì trên căn bản tế lễ ấy Kinh Luật đã được ban hành cho dân chúng, thì tại sao còn cần một vị tế lễ khác dấy lên theo dòng Mên-chi-xê-đéc chứ không theo dòng A-rôn?
|
|
Hebr
|
CebPinad
|
7:11 |
Karon kon ang pagkahingpit nakab-ot pa pinaagi sa kang Levi nga pagkasacerdote (kay ubos niini gidawat man sa mga tawo ang kasugoan), nganong gikinahanglan pa man nga mobarug ang laing sacerdote sumala sa laray ni Melquisedec, ug dili ang usa nga sumala sa laray ni Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
RomCor
|
7:11 |
Dacă, dar, desăvârşirea ar fi fost cu putinţă prin preoţia leviţilor – căci sub preoţia aceasta a primit poporul Legea – ce nevoie mai era să se ridice un alt preot „după rânduiala lui Melhisedec”, şi nu după rânduiala lui Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
Pohnpeia
|
7:11 |
Eri, Kosonned kohieng aramas en Israel ko pwehki pwihnen samworo en Lipai. Eri, ma doadoahk en samworo en mehn Lipai ko iei doadoahk unsek kei, nahn sohte anahnepen ehu soangen pwihnen samworo en mie duwehte pwihnen samworo duwen koasoandien Melkisedek, ahpw kaidehk duwen koasoandien Aaron.
|
|
Hebr
|
HunUj
|
7:11 |
Ha tehát a tökéletesség elérhető volna a lévita papság által, mert a nép ez alatt kapta a törvényt, mi szükség még azt mondani, hogy Melkisédek rendje szerint más pap támad, aki nem Áron rendje szerint való?
|
|
Hebr
|
GerZurch
|
7:11 |
Wenn es nun Vollendung durch das levitische Priestertum gäbe - im Hinblick auf dieses hat das Volk ja das Gesetz empfangen -, wozu wäre (dann) noch nötig, dass ein andrer nach der Weise Melchisedeks zum Priester bestellt und dass er nicht (Priester) nach der Weise Aarons genannt wurde? (a) Heb 8:6 7
|
|
Hebr
|
GerTafel
|
7:11 |
Wäre nun die Vollendung durch das levitische Priestertum geschehen
|
|
Hebr
|
PorAR
|
7:11 |
De sorte que, se a perfeição fosse pelo sacerdócio levítico (pois sob este o povo recebeu a lei), que necessidade havia ainda de que outro sacerdote se levantasse, segundo a ordem de Melquisedeque, e que não fosse contado segundo a ordem de Arão?
|
|
Hebr
|
DutSVVA
|
7:11 |
Indiën dan nu de volkomenheid door het Levietische priesterschap ware ( want onder hetzelve heeft het volk de wet ontvangen), wat nood was het nog, dat een ander priester naar de ordening van Melchizedek zou opstaan, en die niet zou gezegd worden te zijn naar de ordening van Aäron?
|
|
Hebr
|
Byz
|
7:11 |
ει μεν ουν τελειωσις δια της λευιτικης ιερωσυνης ην ο λαος γαρ επ αυτη νενομοθετητο τις ετι χρεια κατα την ταξιν μελχισεδεκ ετερον ανιστασθαι ιερεα και ου κατα την ταξιν ααρων λεγεσθαι
|
|
Hebr
|
FarOPV
|
7:11 |
و دیگر اگر از کهانت لاوی، کمال حاصل میشد (زیرا قوم شریعت را بر آن یافتند)، باز چه احتیاج میبود که کاهنی دیگر بر رتبه ملکیصدق مبعوث شود و مذکور شود که بر رتبه هارون نیست؟
|
|
Hebr
|
Ndebele
|
7:11 |
Ngakho-ke uba kwakukhona ukuphelela ngobupristi bukaLevi (ngoba isizwe sanikwa umlayo ngaphansi kwabo), kwakusaswelekelani ukuthi kuvele omunye umpristi ngokohlobo lukaMelkizedeki, lokungatshiwo ngokwendlela kaAroni?
|
|
Hebr
|
PorBLivr
|
7:11 |
Portanto, se a perfeição tivesse sido de fato pelo sacerdócio Levítico (pois sob ele o povo recebeu a Lei), que mais necessidade havia de se levantar outro Sacerdote segundo a ordem de Melquisedeque, e não ser chamado segundo a ordem de Arão?
|
|
Hebr
|
StatResG
|
7:11 |
¶Εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευιτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν, ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπʼ αὐτῆς νενομοθέτηται, τίς ἔτι χρεία κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισέδεκ, ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα, καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι;
|
|
Hebr
|
SloStrit
|
7:11 |
Če je bilo torej popolnjenje po Levijevem duhovništvu (ljudstvo namreč je na njegovi podlogi postavo prejelo), kaj še treba, da, "po redu Melhizedekovem" vstane drug duhovnik in se ne imenuje po redu Aronovem?
|
|
Hebr
|
Norsk
|
7:11 |
Var det da fullkommenhet å vinne ved det levittiske prestedømme - for dette var folket bundet til ved loven - hvad trang hadde det da vært til at en annen prest skulde opstå efter Melkisedeks vis og ikke nevnes efter Arons vis?
|
|
Hebr
|
SloChras
|
7:11 |
Ako se je torej dosegla popolnost po Levijem duhovništvu (na podlagi tega je namreč ljudstvo prejelo postavo), kaka potreba je bila še, da se postavi drugačen duhovnik „po redu Melhizedekovem“ in se ne imenuje po redu Aronovem?
|
|
Hebr
|
Northern
|
7:11 |
Beləliklə, əgər kamillik Levililərin kahinliyi vasitəsilə əldə edilsəydi – çünki xalq bu kahinliyə əsasən Qanunu alıb – Harun vəzifəli deyil, Melkisedeq vəzifəli başqa bir kahinin təyin edilməsi barədə danışmağa daha nə ehtiyac vardı?
|
|
Hebr
|
GerElb19
|
7:11 |
Wenn nun die Vollkommenheit durch das levitische Priestertum wäre (denn in Verbindung mit demselben hat das Volk das Gesetz empfangen), welches Bedürfnis war noch vorhanden, daß ein anderer Priester nach der Ordnung Melchisedeks aufstehe, und nicht nach der Ordnung Aarons genannt werde?
|
|
Hebr
|
PohnOld
|
7:11 |
Ari, ma dodok en samero Lewi unsokela — pwe i ansau irail aleer kapung o — da katepan amen samero en pwarado ni al en Melkisedek, a kaidin ni al en Aron?
|
|
Hebr
|
LvGluck8
|
7:11 |
Ja tad nu tā pilnība būtu caur to priestera amatu no Levja cilts, (jo līdz ar to tie ļaudis bauslību ir dabūjuši), kam tad vēl vajadzēja citam priesterim celties pēc Melhizedeka kārtas, un netikt sauktam pēc Ārona kārtas?
|
|
Hebr
|
PorAlmei
|
7:11 |
De sorte que, se a perfeição fosse pelo sacerdocio levitico (porque debaixo d'elle o povo recebeu a lei), que necessidade havia logo de que outro sacerdote se levantasse, segundo a ordem de Melchisedec, e não fosse chamado segundo a ordem de Aarão?
|
|
Hebr
|
ChiUn
|
7:11 |
從前百姓在利未人祭司職任以下受律法，倘若藉這職任能得完全，又何用另外興起一位祭司，照麥基洗德的等次，不照亞倫的等次呢？
|
|
Hebr
|
SweKarlX
|
7:11 |
Är nu fullkomlighet skedd genom det Levitiska Presterskapet, ty derunder fick folket lagen; hvad behöfde sägas, att en annar Prest uppkomma skulle, efter Melchisedeks sätt, och icke efter Aarons sätt?
|
|
Hebr
|
Antoniad
|
7:11 |
ει μεν ουν τελειωσις δια της λευιτικης ιερωσυνης ην ο λαος γαρ επ αυτη νενομοθετητο τις ετι χρεια κατα την ταξιν μελχισεδεκ ετερον ανιστασθαι ιερεα και ου κατα την ταξιν ααρων λεγεσθαι
|
|
Hebr
|
CopSahid
|
7:11 |
ⲉⲛⲉⲟⲩⲛⲟⲩϫⲱⲕ ϭⲉ ⲉⲃⲟⲗ ϣⲟⲟⲡ ⲛⲧⲙⲛⲧⲟⲩⲏⲏⲃ ⲛⲗⲉⲩⲉⲓ ⲡⲗⲁⲟⲥ ⲅⲁⲣ ⲉⲛⲧⲁϥϫⲓⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ ϩⲓⲱⲱⲥ ⲛⲉⲟⲩ ⲧⲉ ⲧⲉⲭⲣⲓⲁ ⲉⲧⲣⲉϥⲧⲱⲟⲩⲛ ⲛϭⲓⲕⲉⲟⲩⲏⲏⲃ ⲕⲁⲧⲁⲧⲧⲁⲝⲓⲥ ⲙⲙⲉⲗⲭⲓⲥⲉⲇⲉⲕ ⲁⲩⲱ ⲛⲥⲉⲧⲙϫⲟⲟⲥ ϫⲉ ⲕⲁⲧⲁⲧⲧⲁⲝⲓⲥ ⲛⲁⲁⲣⲱⲛ
|
|
Hebr
|
GerAlbre
|
7:11 |
Wäre nun freilich durch das levitische Priestertum Vollkommenheit erzielt worden — und auf diesem Priestertum beruht ja das Gesetz, das dem Volk gegeben ist —, warum mußte dann ein ganz neuer Priester "nach der Weise Melchisedeks" auftreten? Warum wurde nicht geredet von einem Priester "nach der Weise Aarons"?
|
|
Hebr
|
BulCarig
|
7:11 |
И тъй, ако бе било съвършенството чрез Левитското свещенство, (защото народът под него прие закона;) каква нужда вече да се привдигне друг свещеник по чина Мелхиседеков, и да се не казва по чина Ааронов?
|
|
Hebr
|
FrePGR
|
7:11 |
Si donc la perfection eût été réalisée par la prêtrise lévitique, (car c'est à celle-ci que se rapporte la loi donnée au peuple), il n'eût pas encore été nécessaire que ce fût selon le rang de Melchisédec que s'installât un autre prêtre, et qu'il ne fût pas désigné selon le rang d'Aaron ;
|
|
Hebr
|
JapDenmo
|
7:11 |
ところで，もしレビの祭司職を通して完全にすることがあったとすれば（民はそのもとで律法を受けたのですが），どうしてこれ以上，アロンの位に等しいと呼ばれず，むしろメルキゼデクの位に等しい別の祭司が立てられる必要があるでしょうか。
|
|
Hebr
|
PorCap
|
7:11 |
*Ora, se a perfeição tivesse sido realizada pelo sacerdócio levítico – sob ele o povo recebeu a Lei – que necessidade havia de que surgisse um outro sacerdote segundo a ordem de Melquisedec, e não segundo a ordem de Aarão?
|
|
Hebr
|
JapKougo
|
7:11 |
もし全うされることがレビ系の祭司制によって可能であったら――民は祭司制の下に律法を与えられたのであるが――なんの必要があって、なお、「アロンに等しい」と呼ばれない、別な「メルキゼデクに等しい」祭司が立てられるのであるか。
|
|
Hebr
|
Tausug
|
7:11 |
Na, sin masa nakauna yadtu ha waktu piyanaug sin Tuhan in sara' niya pa bangsa natu', hīnang niya imam suluhan hinda Libi iban sin manga panubu' niya, amu in nagkaput iban nagpapanaw sin sara' niya. Sumagawa' in hinang sin manga panubu' hi Libi, wala' nakarā ha manga tau pa dān mabuntul tudju pa Tuhan. Hangkan magkalagihan palahilun in hambuuk tau mag'imam suluhan ha manga tau pa Tuhan, amu in biya' pag'imam hi Malkisadik, bukun biya' kan Harun, amu in hambuuk imam panubu' hi Libi.
|
|
Hebr
|
GerTextb
|
7:11 |
Hätte es nun eine Vollendung durch das Levitische Priestertum gegeben (die Gesetzgebung des Volkes gieng ja auf dasselbe), wozu war es dann noch nötig, daß ein anderer Priester nach der Ordnung Melchisedek aufgestellt und nicht nach der Ordnung Aarons benannt wird?
|
|
Hebr
|
Kapingam
|
7:11 |
Nnaganoho digau Israel ne-hagamau mai i nnegau dabu o digau hai-mee-dabu o Levi. Maa nei-boloo nnegau digau hai-mee-dabu ne-donu ge dohu, gei tangada hai-mee-dabu e-gila-aga labelaa ai, mai di ala o Melchizedek hagalee mai di ala o Aaron.
|
|
Hebr
|
SpaPlate
|
7:11 |
Si, pues, la perfección se hubiera dado por medio del sacerdocio levítico, ya que bajo él recibió el pueblo la Ley ¿qué necesidad aún de que se levantase otro sacerdote según el orden de Melquisedec y que no se denominase según el orden de Aarón?
|
|
Hebr
|
RusVZh
|
7:11 |
Итак, если бы совершенство достигалось посредством левитского священства, - ибо с ним сопряжен закон народа, - то какая бы еще нужда была восставать иному священнику по чину Мелхиседека, а не по чину Аарона именоваться?
|
|
Hebr
|
CopSahid
|
7:11 |
ⲉⲛⲉⲟⲩⲛ ⲟⲩϫⲱⲕ ϭⲉ ⲉⲃⲟⲗ ϣⲟⲟⲡ ⲛⲧⲙⲛⲧⲟⲩⲏⲏⲃ ⲛⲗⲉⲩⲉⲓ ⲡⲗⲁⲟⲥ ⲅⲁⲣ ⲉⲛⲧⲁϥϫⲓ ⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ ϩⲓⲱⲱⲥ ⲛⲉⲟⲩ ⲧⲉ ⲧⲉⲭⲣⲓⲁ ⲉⲧⲣⲉϥⲧⲱⲟⲩⲛ ⲛϭⲓ ⲕⲉⲟⲩⲏⲏⲃ ⲕⲁⲧⲁ ⲧⲧⲁⲝⲓⲥ ⲙⲙⲉⲗⲭⲓⲥⲉⲇⲉⲕ ⲁⲩⲱ ⲛⲥⲉⲧⲙϫⲟⲟⲥ ϫⲉ ⲕⲁⲧⲁ ⲧⲧⲁⲝⲓⲥ ⲛⲁⲁⲣⲱⲛ.
|
|
Hebr
|
LtKBB
|
7:11 |
Jeigu tobulumas būtų buvęs pasiekiamas levitų kunigystės dėka, – o tauta jos pagrindu buvo gavusi įstatymą, – tai kam dar būtų reikėję iškilti kitam kunigui Melchizedeko būdu ir nesivadinti kunigu Aarono būdu?
|
|
Hebr
|
Bela
|
7:11 |
І вось, калі б дасканаласьць дасягалася празь лявіцкае сьвятарства, — бо зь ім спалучаны закон народу, — дык якая яшчэ была б патрэба зьяўляцца іншаму сьвятару па чыне Мелхісэдэка, а не па чыне Абрагамавым звацца?
|
|
Hebr
|
CopSahHo
|
7:11 |
ⲉⲛⲉⲟⲩⲛ̅ⲟⲩϫⲱⲕ ϭⲉ ⲉⲃⲟⲗ ϣⲟⲟⲡ ⲛ̅ⲧⲙⲛ̅ⲧⲟⲩⲏⲏⲃ ⲛ̅ⲗⲉⲩⲉⲓ. ⲡⲗⲁⲟⲥ ⲅⲁⲣ ⲉⲛⲧⲁϥϫⲓⲛⲟⲙⲟⲥ ϩⲓⲱⲱⲥ. ⲛⲉⲟⲩ ⲧⲉ ⲧⲉⲭⲣⲓⲁ ⲉⲧⲣⲉϥⲧⲱⲟⲩⲛ ⲛ̅ϭⲓⲕⲉⲟⲩⲏⲏⲃ ⲕⲁⲧⲁⲧⲧⲁⲝⲓⲥ ⲙ̅ⲙⲉⲗⲭⲓⲥⲉⲇⲉⲕ. ⲁⲩⲱ ⲛ̅ⲥⲉⲧⲙ̅ϫⲟⲟⲥ ϫⲉ ⲕⲁⲧⲁⲧⲧⲁⲝⲓⲥ ⲛ̅ⲁⲁⲣⲱⲛ.
|
|
Hebr
|
BretonNT
|
7:11 |
Mar bije eta ar barfeted en em gavet e belegiezh Levi, rak dindan houmañ eo a zo bet roet al lezenn d'ar bobl, petra e oa ezhomm c'hoazh ma savje ur beleg all hervez urzh Melkizedek ha nann hervez urzh Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
GerBoLut
|
7:11 |
Ist nun die Vollkommenheit durch das levitische Priestertum geschehen (denn unter demselbigen hat das Volk das Gesetz empfangen), was ist denn weiter not zu sagen, daß ein anderer Priester aufkommen solle nach der Ordnung Melchisedeks und nicht nach der Ordnung Aarons?
|
|
Hebr
|
FinPR92
|
7:11 |
Jos jo Leevin heimon pappisvirka, josta Israelin kansalle on annettu säädökset laissa, olisi johtanut täydellisyyteen, mitä tarvetta olisi ollut sanoa, että vielä tulee uudenlainen pappi, jonka pappeus on Melkisedekin pappeutta, ei Aaronin?
|
|
Hebr
|
DaNT1819
|
7:11 |
Hvis der altsaa var Fuldkommelse ved det levitiske Præstedømme, (thi til dette var Folket lovbundet,) hvi gjordes det da ydermere behov, at en anden Præst skulde opstaae efter Melchisedeks Viis, og ikke benævnes efter Aarons Viis?
|
|
Hebr
|
Uma
|
7:11 |
Nto'u Alata'ala mpowai' Atura-na hi to Yahudi, na'ongko' muli Lewi napajadi' -ra imam to mpohawai' ntodea mpotuku' Atura-na toe. Tapi' pobago imam toera uma mpomoroli' manusia' hi poncilo Alata'ala. Toe-mi pai' kana mehupa' imam to ntani' -nae. Imam to mehupa' toei, imam to hewa Melkisedek, bela-i muli Lewi hewa Harun.
|
|
Hebr
|
GerLeoNA
|
7:11 |
Wenn nun Vollkommenheit durch das levitische Priestertum bestünde (schließlich hat das Volk darunter das Gesetz erhalten), welche Notwendigkeit [gäbe es] noch, dass ein anderer Priester „nach der Ordnung Melchisedeks“ aufsteht und nicht [einer] „nach der Ordnung Aarons“ benannt wird?
|
|
Hebr
|
SpaVNT
|
7:11 |
Pues si la perfeccion era por el sacerdocio Levítico (porque debajo de él recibió el pueblo la ley) ¿qué necesidad [habia] aun de que se levantase otro sacerdote segun el órden de Melchisedech, y que no fuese llamado segun el ó rden de Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
Latvian
|
7:11 |
Ja jau Levi priesterība (jo tauta tās laikā saņēma likumu) būtu nesusi pilnību, kāda vēl bija vajadzība celties citam priesterim saskaņā ar Melhizedeka iekārtu un nesaukties pēc Ārona iekārtas?
|
|
Hebr
|
SpaRV186
|
7:11 |
Si pues la perfección era por el sacerdocio Levítico, (porque debajo de él recibió el pueblo la ley,) ¿qué necesidad había aun de que se levantase otro sacerdote según el orden de Melquisedec, y que no se dijese según el orden de Aarón?
|
|
Hebr
|
FreStapf
|
7:11 |
Si l'on avait pu réaliser la perfection par le sacerdoce lévitique (car la législation donnée au peuple a pour base ce sacerdoce), pourquoi fallait-il qu'il parût un autre «prêtre» «selon l'ordre de Melchisédek» pourquoi pas selon l'ordre d'Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
NlCanisi
|
7:11 |
Zo dus de volmaaktheid bereikt was door het levietische priesterschap—want daarop berustte de wetgeving voor het volk waarom zou het dan nog nodig geweest zijn, dat er een andere Priester werd aangesteld "naar de Orde van Melkisedek," en dat Hij niet naar de orde van Aäron werd genoemd?
|
|
Hebr
|
GerNeUe
|
7:11 |
Wenn nun das levitische Priestertum zur Vollkommenheit hätte führen können – denn das Gesetz, das unserem Volk gegeben wurde, beruhte ja darauf –, warum hätte Gott dann noch einen Priester einsetzen sollen, der zu einer ganz anderen Priesterordnung gehört, nämlich zu der von Melchisedek anstatt zu der von Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
Est
|
7:11 |
Kui nüüd täiuslikkus oleks leviitide preestriameti kaudu olnud saavutatud - sest sellele on rajatud rahva käsuõpetus - mis vajadust siis veel oli, et teistsugune preester tõusis Melkisedeki korra järgi ega nimetatud teda Aaroni korra järgi?
|
|
Hebr
|
UrduGeo
|
7:11 |
اگر لاوی کی کہانت (جس پر شریعت مبنی تھی) کاملیت پیدا کر سکتی تو پھر ایک اَور قسم کے امام کی کیا ضرورت ہوتی، اُس کی جو ہارون جیسا نہ ہو بلکہ مَلِک صدق جیسا؟
|
|
Hebr
|
AraNAV
|
7:11 |
إِنَّ شَرِيعَةَ مُوسَى كُلَّهَا كَانَتْ تَدُورُ حَوْلَ نِظَامِ الْكَهَنُوتِ الَّذِي قَامَ بَنُو لاَوِي بِتَأْدِيَةِ وَاجِبَاتِهِ. إِلاَّ أَنَّ ذَلِكَ النِّظَامَ لَمْ يُوصِلْ إِلَى الْكَمَالِ أُولئِكَ الَّذِينَ كَانُوا يَعْبُدُونَ اللهَ عَلَى أَسَاسِهِ. وَإِلاَّ، لَمَا دَعَتِ الْحَاجَةُ إِلَى تَعْيِينِ كَاهِنٍ آخَرَ عَلَى رُتْبَةِ مَلْكِيصَادَقَ، وَلَيْسَ عَلَى رُتْبَةِ هَرُونَ!
|
|
Hebr
|
ChiNCVs
|
7:11 |
这样看来，如果借着利未人的祭司制度能达到完全的地步（人民是在这制度下领受律法的），为什么还需要照着麦基洗德的体系，另外兴起一位祭司，而不照着亚伦的体系呢？
|
|
Hebr
|
f35
|
7:11 |
ει μεν ουν τελειωσις δια της λευιτικης ιερωσυνης ην ο λαος γαρ επ αυτη νενομοθετητο τις ετι χρεια κατα την ταξιν μελχισεδεκ ετερον ανιστασθαι ιερεα και ου κατα την ταξιν ααρων λεγεσθαι
|
|
Hebr
|
vlsJoNT
|
7:11 |
Als er dan nu volkomenheid was door het levitische priesterdom— want met het oog op dit priesterschap heeft het volk de wet ontvangen— wat was het dan nog noodig dat er een ander priester zou opstaan naar de ordening van Melchizedek, en die niet naar de ordening van Aaron zou gerekend worden?
|
|
Hebr
|
ItaRive
|
7:11 |
Ora, se la perfezione fosse stata possibile per mezzo del sacerdozio levitico (perché su quello è basata la legge data al popolo), che bisogno c’era ancora che sorgesse un altro sacerdote secondo l’ordine di Melchisedec e non scelto secondo l’ordine d’Aronne?
|
|
Hebr
|
Afr1953
|
7:11 |
As daar dan volkomenheid deur die Levitiese priesterskap was — want met die oog daarop het die volk die wet ontvang — waarom was dit nog nodig dat 'n ander priester moes opstaan volgens die orde van Melgisédek en dat hy dit nie volgens die orde van Aäron genoem word nie?
|
|
Hebr
|
RusSynod
|
7:11 |
Итак, если бы совершенство достигалось посредством левитского священства, – ибо с ним сопряжен закон народа, – то какая бы еще нужда была восставать иному священнику по чину Мелхиседека, а не по чину Аарона именоваться?
|
|
Hebr
|
FreOltra
|
7:11 |
Si donc la perfection avait pu être réalisée par le moyen du sacerdoce lévitique (car le peuple a reçu une législation qui repose sur ce sacerdoce), qu'était-il encore besoin qu'il parût un autre sacrificateur «selon l’ordre de Melchisédec,» et non selon l'ordre d'Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
UrduGeoD
|
7:11 |
अगर लावी की कहानत (जिस पर शरीअत मबनी थी) कामिलियत पैदा कर सकती तो फिर एक और क़िस्म के इमाम की क्या ज़रूरत होती, उस की जो हारून जैसा न हो बल्कि मलिके-सिद्क़ जैसा?
|
|
Hebr
|
TurNTB
|
7:11 |
Eğer Levililer'in kâhinliği aracılığıyla yetkinliğe erişilebilseydi –nitekim Kutsal Yasa bu kâhinliği öngörerek halka verildi– Harun düzenine göre değil de, Melkisedek düzenine göre başka bir kâhinin gelmesinden söz etmeye ne gerek kalırdı?
|
|
Hebr
|
DutSVV
|
7:11 |
Indien dan nu de volkomenheid door het Levietische priesterschap ware (want onder hetzelve heeft het volk de wet ontvangen), wat nood was het nog, dat een ander priester naar de ordening van Melchizedek zou opstaan, en die niet zou gezegd worden te zijn naar de ordening van Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
HunKNB
|
7:11 |
Ha tehát a tökéletességet a leviták papsága jelentette volna – a nép ugyanis őalattuk kapta a törvényt –, mi szükség lett volna arra, hogy Melkizedek rendje szerint más pap támadjon , aki nem Áron rendje szerint való?
|
|
Hebr
|
Maori
|
7:11 |
Na, ki te mea na ta te Riwai mahi tohunga i tino rite ai, a i na runga hoki i tera te rironga o te ture i te iwi, he aha atu te mea e whakatika ake ai tetahi atu tohunga i runga i to Merekihereke ritenga; te kiia ai i runga i to Arona ritenga?
|
|
Hebr
|
sml_BL_2
|
7:11 |
Na, ma waktu tagna' inān aniya' sara' pamat'nna' e' Tuhan ma bangsa Isra'il, maka aniya' kaimaman panubu' si Libi bay gin'llal magsuluhan. Manjari bang panubu' si Libi itu bay taga-kawasa amasampulna' kajarihan saga pagkahi sigām, angay subay aniya' bowahan imam saddī buwat kapagimam si Malkisadik? Angay mbal bineya' kapagimam si Harun ya panubu' si Libi?
|
|
Hebr
|
HunKar
|
7:11 |
Ha tehát a lévitai papság által volna a tökéletesség (mert a nép ez alatt nyerte a törvényt): mi szükség tovább is mondogatni, hogy más pap támadjon a Melkisédek rendje szerint és ne az Áron rendje szerint?
|
|
Hebr
|
Viet
|
7:11 |
Nếu có thể được sự trọn vẹn bởi chức tế lễ của người Lê-vi (vì luật pháp ban cho dân đang khi còn dưới quyền chức tế lễ), thì cớ sao còn cần phải dấy lên một thầy tế lễ khác, lập theo ban Mên-chi-xê-đéc, không theo ban A-rôn?
|
|
Hebr
|
Kekchi
|
7:11 |
Li ralal xcˈajol laj Leví ut laj Aarón, aˈaneb li nequeˈchˈoloban chiruheb laj Israel lix ya̱lal lix chakˈrab li Dios li quixye laj Moisés. Abanan chi moco li chakˈrab chi moco eb laj tij li ta̱ru̱k ta̱colok ke. Cui ta eb laj tij ut li chakˈrab, incˈaˈ raj chic quitakla̱c chak junak aj tij kˈaxal nim xcuanquil joˈ nak quicuan laj Melquisedec. Laj tij li quitakla̱c chak ma̱cuaˈ xcomoneb laj Aarón.
|
|
Hebr
|
Swe1917
|
7:11 |
Vore det nu så, att fullkomning kunde vinnas genom det levitiska prästadömet -- och på detta var ju folkets lagstiftning byggd -- varför hade det då behövts att en präst av annat slag, »efter Melkisedeks sätt», skulle uppstå, en som icke nämnes »efter Arons sätt»?
|
|
Hebr
|
KhmerNT
|
7:11 |
ដូច្នេះ បើមុខងារជាសង្ឃរបស់ពួកលេវីនាំឲ្យគ្រប់លក្ខណ៍ (ដ្បិតក្រោមមុខងារនេះ ប្រជាជនទទួលបានគម្ពីរវិន័យ) តើហេតុអ្វីបានជានៅតែត្រូវការឲ្យមានការតែងតាំងសង្ឃផ្សេងទៀតដូចលោកម៉ិលគីស្សាដែក មិនមែនដូចលោកអើរ៉ុនដូច្នេះ?
|
|
Hebr
|
CroSaric
|
7:11 |
Da se dakle savršenstvo postiglo po levitskom svećeništvu - jer na temelju njega narod je dobio Zakon - koja bi onda bila potreba da se po redu Melkisedekovu postavi drugi svećenik i da se ne imenuje po redu Aronovu?
|
|
Hebr
|
BasHauti
|
7:11 |
Beraz baldin perfectionea Sacrificadoregoa Leuiticoan içan baliz (ecen populuac Leguea haren azpian recebitu vkan du) cer behar cen goitiric berce Sacrificadorebat Melchisedech-en façoinera altcha ledin, eta ezladin Aaronen façoinera erran?
|
|
Hebr
|
WHNU
|
7:11 |
ει μεν ουν τελειωσις δια της λευιτικης ιερωσυνης ην ο λαος γαρ επ αυτης νενομοθετηται τις ετι χρεια κατα την ταξιν μελχισεδεκ ετερον ανιστασθαι ιερεα και ου κατα την ταξιν ααρων λεγεσθαι
|
|
Hebr
|
VieLCCMN
|
7:11 |
Chức vụ tư tế Lê-vi là nền tảng của Lề Luật Thiên Chúa đã ban cho Dân. Vậy giả như người ta đạt được sự hoàn thiện nhờ chức vụ tư tế đó rồi, thì còn cần chi phải đặt lên một tư tế khác theo phẩm trật Men-ki-xê-đê, thay vì theo phẩm trật A-ha-ron ?
|
|
Hebr
|
FreBDM17
|
7:11 |
Si donc la perfection s’était trouvée dans la sacrificature Lévitique, (car c’est sous elle que le peuple a reçu la Loi) quel besoin était-il après cela qu’un autre Sacrificateur se levât selon l’ordre de Melchisédec, et qui ne fût point dit selon l’ordre d’Aaron.
|
|
Hebr
|
TR
|
7:11 |
ει μεν ουν τελειωσις δια της λευιτικης ιερωσυνης ην ο λαος γαρ επ αυτη νενομοθετητο τις ετι χρεια κατα την ταξιν μελχισεδεκ ετερον ανιστασθαι ιερεα και ου κατα την ταξιν ααρων λεγεσθαι
|
|
Hebr
|
HebModer
|
7:11 |
על כן אלו היתה שלמות על ידי כהנת בני לוי אשר בה נתנה התורה לעם למה זה צריך לקום עוד כהן אחר על דברתי מלכי צדק ולא יאמר על דברתי אהרן׃
|
|
Hebr
|
Kaz
|
7:11 |
Таурат заңы Исраил халқына леуіліктердің діни қызметінің негізінде тапсырылды. Егер осылардың қызметі көзделген мақсатқа қол жеткізген болса, онда Мәліксадық іспетті басқа діни қызметкердің тағайындалуының қажеті болмай, (Леуінің ұрпағы) Һароннан тараған діни қызметкерлер де жетіп жатқан болар еді. Алайда олардың қызметі жеткіліксіз болды.
|
|
Hebr
|
UkrKulis
|
7:11 |
Коли ж звершеннє було через Левійське сьвященствб (бо під ним люде озаконені стались), то яка ж іще потреба иншому встати сьвященикові по чину Мелхиседековому, а не по чину Аароновому звати ся?
|
|
Hebr
|
FreJND
|
7:11 |
Si donc la perfection était par la sacrificature lévitique, (car c’est en relation avec elle que le peuple a reçu sa loi,) quel besoin était-il encore qu’un autre sacrificateur se lève selon l’ordre de Melchisédec et qui ne soit pas nommé selon l’ordre d’Aaron ?
|
|
Hebr
|
TurHADI
|
7:11 |
Allah, Tevrat’taki şeriatı İsrail halkına verdiğinde Levi soyundan rahipler seçti. Ne var ki, Levili rahipler insanları kemale eriştiremediler. Bunu yapabilseydiler, Harun gibi değil de Melkisedek gibi başka bir rahibin gelmesinden söz etmeye gerek kalmazdı.
|
|
Hebr
|
GerGruen
|
7:11 |
Wenn nun das levitische Priestertum, auf das das Volk gesetzlich festgelegt war, schon die Vollendung gebracht hätte, wäre es dann notwendig gewesen, noch einen andern nach der Ordnung des Melchisedech als Priester aufzustellen und davon zu reden, daß er es nicht nach der Ordnung Aarons sei?
|
|
Hebr
|
SloKJV
|
7:11 |
Če je bila torej popolnost po Lévijevem duhovništvu (kajti pod njim so ljudje prejeli postavo), kakšna je bila nadaljnja potreba, da bi nastopil drug duhovnik po Melkízedekovem redu in ne bi bil imenovan po Aronovem redu?
|
|
Hebr
|
Haitian
|
7:11 |
Se sou baz travay prèt ras Levi yo Bondye te bay pèp Izrayèl la lalwa Moyiz la. Si travay prèt ras Levi yo te yon travay ki te bon nèt, pa ta gen nesesite menm pou yon lòt prèt ki menm jan ak Mèlkisedèk men ki pa menm jan ak Arawon ta vini.
|
|
Hebr
|
FinBibli
|
7:11 |
Sentähden, jos täydellisyys on Levin pappeuden kautta tapahtunut; (sillä sen alla on kansa lain saanut,) mitä sitte oli tarvetta sanoa, että toinen pappi oli Melkisedekin säädyn jälkeen tuleva, ja ei Aaronin säädyn jälkeen?
|
|
Hebr
|
SpaRV
|
7:11 |
Si pues la perfección era por el sacerdocio Levítico (porque debajo de él recibió el pueblo la ley) ¿qué necesidad había aún de que se levantase otro sacerdote según el orden de Melchîsedec, y que no fuese llamado según el orden de Aarón?
|
|
Hebr
|
HebDelit
|
7:11 |
עַל־כֵּן אִלּוּ הָיְתָה שְׁלֵמוּת עַל־יְדֵי כְהֻנַּת בְּנֵי לֵוִי אֲשֶׁר־בָּהּ נִתְּנָה הַתּוֹרָה לָעָם לָמָּה־זֶּה צָרִיךְ לָקוּם עוֹד כֹּהֵן אַחֵר עַל־דִּבְרָתִי מַלְכִּי־צֶדֶק וְלֹא יֹאמַר עַל־דִּבְרָתִי אַהֲרֹן׃
|
|
Hebr
|
WelBeibl
|
7:11 |
Mae'r Gyfraith Iddewig yn dibynnu ar waith yr offeiriaid sy'n perthyn i urdd Lefi. Os oedd y drefn offeiriadol hon yn cyflawni bwriadau Duw yn berffaith pam roedd angen i offeiriad arall ddod? Pam wnaeth Duw anfon un oedd yr un fath â Melchisedec yn hytrach nag un oedd yn perthyn i urdd Lefi ac Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
GerMenge
|
7:11 |
Freilich, wenn eine Vollendung durch das levitische Priestertum möglich wäre – auf diesem (Priestertum) beruht ja die ganze Gesetzgebung des Volkes –: welches Bedürfnis hätte dann noch vorgelegen, einen andersartigen Priester »nach der Ordnung Melchisedeks« einzusetzen und ihn nicht (einfach) »nach der Ordnung Aarons« zu benennen?
|
|
Hebr
|
GreVamva
|
7:11 |
Εάν λοιπόν η τελειότης υπήρχε διά Λευϊτικής ιερωσύνης· διότι ο λαός επ' αυτής έλαβε τον νόμον· τις χρεία πλέον να εγερθή άλλος ιερεύς κατά την τάξιν Μελχισεδέχ, και ουχί να λέγηται κατά την τάξιν Ααρών;
|
|
Hebr
|
Tisch
|
7:11 |
Εἰ μὲν οὖν τελείωσις διὰ τῆς Λευειτικῆς ἱερωσύνης ἦν, ὁ λαὸς γὰρ ἐπ’ αὐτῆς νενομοθέτηται, τίς ἔτι χρεία κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Μελχισεδὲκ ἕτερον ἀνίστασθαι ἱερέα καὶ οὐ κατὰ τὴν τάξιν Ἀαρὼν λέγεσθαι;
|
|
Hebr
|
UkrOgien
|
7:11 |
Отож, коли б досконалість була через свяще́нство леви́тське, — бо люди Зако́на оде́ржали з ним, — то яка ще потреба була, щоб Інший Священик повстав за чином Мелхиседе́ковим, а не зватися за чином Ааро́новим?
|
|
Hebr
|
MonKJV
|
7:11 |
Тиймээс хэрэв төгс байдал нь үнэхээр Лэвийчүүдийн тахилчийн албаар (учир нь ард түмэн үүний дор хуулийг хүлээн авсан) байсан юм бол Ахарооны цол хэргэмийн дагуу дуудагдаагүй харин Малкийцээдэкийн цол хэргэмийн дагуу босох өөр тахилчийн хэрэг цаашид юу байхсан бэ?
|
|
Hebr
|
FreCramp
|
7:11 |
Si donc la perfection avait pu être réalisée par le sacerdoce lévitique, — car c'est sous lui que le peuple reçut la loi, — quelle nécessité y avait-il qu'il surgît un autre prêtre " selon l'ordre de Melchisédech ", et non selon l'ordre d'Aaron ?
|
|
Hebr
|
SrKDEkav
|
7:11 |
Ако је, дакле, савршенство постало кроз левитско свештенство (јер је народ под њим закон примио), каква је још потреба била говорити да ће други свештеник постати по реду Мелхиседековом, а не по реду Ароновом?
|
|
Hebr
|
PolUGdan
|
7:11 |
Gdyby więc doskonałość była osiągalna przez kapłaństwo lewickie – gdyż lud otrzymał prawo oparte na nim – to jaka byłaby jeszcze potrzeba, aby pojawił się inny kapłan według porządku Melchizedeka, a nie był mianowany według porządku Aarona?
|
|
Hebr
|
FreGenev
|
7:11 |
Si donc la perfection euft efté en la Sacrificature Levitique, (car le peuple a receu la Loi fous elle) quel befoin eftoit-il davantage qu'un autre Sacrificateur fe levaft à la façon de Melchifedech, & qui ne fuft point dit à la façon d'Aaron ?
|
|
Hebr
|
FreSegon
|
7:11 |
Si donc la perfection avait été possible par le sacerdoce Lévitique, -car c'est sur ce sacerdoce que repose la loi donnée au peuple, -qu'était-il encore besoin qu'il parût un autre sacrificateur selon l'ordre de Melchisédek, et non selon l'ordre d'Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
Swahili
|
7:11 |
Kutokana na ukuhani wa Walawi, watu wa Israeli walipewa Sheria. Sasa, kama huduma ya Walawi ingalikuwa kamilifu hapangekuwa tena na haja ya kutokea ukuhani mwingine tofauti, ukuhani ambao umefuata utaratibu wa ukuhani wa Melkisedeki, na si ule wa Aroni.
|
|
Hebr
|
SpaRV190
|
7:11 |
Si pues la perfección era por el sacerdocio Levítico (porque debajo de él recibió el pueblo la ley) ¿qué necesidad había aún de que se levantase otro sacerdote según el orden de Melchîsedec, y que no fuese llamado según el orden de Aarón?
|
|
Hebr
|
HunRUF
|
7:11 |
Ha tehát a tökéletesség elérhető volna a lévita papság által – mert a nép ez alatt kapta a törvényt –, mi szükség még azt mondani, hogy Melkisédek rendje szerint más pap jöjjön el, aki nem Áron rendje szerint való?
|
|
Hebr
|
FreSynod
|
7:11 |
Si la perfection avait pu être atteinte par le sacerdoce lévitique — car la législation donnée au peuple a pour base ce sacerdoce, — qu'était-il encore besoin qu'il parût un autre sacrificateur, institué selon l'ordre de Melchisédec, et non selon l'ordre d'Aaron?
|
|
Hebr
|
DaOT1931
|
7:11 |
Hvis der altsaa var Fuldkommelse at faa ved det levitiske Præstedømme (thi paa Grundlag af dette har jo Folket faaet Loven), hvilken Trang var der da yderligere til, at en anden Slags Præst skulde opstaa efter Melkisedeks Vis og ikke nævnes efter Arons Vis?
|
|
Hebr
|
FarHezar
|
7:11 |
اگر دستیابی به کمال، از طریق نظام کهانتِ لاوی میسّر بود – چه قوم قوانینی را در خصوص آن دریافت کرده بودند – پس دیگر چه لزومی داشت کاهنی دیگر، نه از نوع کهانت هارون، بلکه از نوع کهانت مِلْکیصِدِق ظهور کند؟
|
|
Hebr
|
TpiKJPB
|
7:11 |
¶ Olsem na sapos pasin bilong kamap inap tru i kam long wokpris bilong Livai, (long wanem, aninit long en ol manmeri i kisim lo,) i gat wanem nid moa long narapela pris i mas kirap i bihainim lain bilong Melkisedek, na ol i no kolim ol i bihainim lain bilong Eron?
|
|
Hebr
|
ArmWeste
|
7:11 |
Ուրեմն, եթէ կատարելութիւնը Ղեւտացիներու քահանայութեամբ ըլլար, (քանի որ ժողովուրդը Օրէնքին տակ դրուեցաւ անոր ատենը,) ա՛լ ի՞նչ պէտք կար որ ուրի՛շ քահանայ մը ելլէր՝ Մելքիսեդեկի կարգին համեմատ, եւ չկոչուէր Ահարոնի կարգին համեմատ:
|
|
Hebr
|
DaOT1871
|
7:11 |
Hvis der altsaa var Fuldkommelse at faa ved det levitiske Præstedømme (thi paa Grundlag af dette har jo Folket faaet Loven), hvilken Trang var der da yderligere til, at en anden Slags Præst skulde opstaa efter Melkisedeks Vis og ikke nævnes efter Arons Vis?
|
|
Hebr
|
JapRague
|
7:11 |
民はレヴィ族の司祭職の下に在りて律法を受けたれば、若人を完全ならしむる事レヴィの司祭職によりしならば、アアロンの如きと謂はれずして、他にメルキセデクの如き司祭の起る必要は何處にか在りし。
|
|
Hebr
|
Peshitta
|
7:11 |
ܐܠܘ ܗܟܝܠ ܓܡܝܪܘܬܐ ܒܝܕ ܟܘܡܪܘܬܐ ܕܠܘܝܐ ܐܝܬܝܗ ܗܘܬ ܕܒܗ ܤܝV ܢܡܘܤܐ ܠܥܡܐ ܠܡܢܐ ܡܬܒܥܐ ܗܘܐ ܟܘܡܪܐ ܐܚܪܢܐ ܕܢܩܘV ܒܕܡܘܬܗ ܕܡܠܟܝܙܕܩ ܐܡܪ ܕܝܢ ܕܒܕܡܘܬܗ ܕܐܗܪܘܢ ܢܗܘܐ ܀
|
|
Hebr
|
FreVulgG
|
7:11 |
Si donc la perfection avait pu être réalisée par le sacerdoce lévitique (car c’est sous lui que le peuple reçut la loi), qu’était-il encore besoin qu’il se levât un autre prêtre selon l’ordre de Melchisédech, et non selon l’ordre d’Aaron ?
|
|
Hebr
|
PolGdans
|
7:11 |
A przetoż byłali doskonałość przez kapłaństwo lewickie, (gdyż za niego wydany jest zakon ludowi), jakaż tego jeszcze była potrzeba, aby inszy kapłan według porządku Melchisedekowego powstał, a nie był według porządku Aaronowego mianowany?
|
|
Hebr
|
JapBungo
|
7:11 |
もしレビの系なる祭司によりて全うせらるる事ありしならば（民は之によりて律法を受けたり）何ぞなほ他にアロンの位に等しからぬメルキゼデクの位に等しき祭司の起る必要あらんや。
|
|
Hebr
|
Elzevir
|
7:11 |
ει μεν ουν τελειωσις δια της λευιτικης ιερωσυνης ην ο λαος γαρ επ αυτη νενομοθετητο τις ετι χρεια κατα την ταξιν μελχισεδεκ ετερον ανιστασθαι ιερεα και ου κατα την ταξιν ααρων λεγεσθαι
|
|
Hebr
|
GerElb18
|
7:11 |
Wenn nun die Vollkommenheit durch das levitische Priestertum wäre, welches Bedürfnis war noch vorhanden, daß ein anderer Priester nach der Ordnung Melchisedeks aufstehe, und nicht nach der Ordnung Aarons genannt werde?
|